Clowney’s Triangle

I’ve written before about how the Old Testament is to be read in light of the New. The Bible isn’t just some book of random stories that can be taken out of context and smushed together in new formations like pieces of an Erector Set. Rather, it’s one story, and it’s parts relate to each other in the ways they were intended by God to do. The task for us is to discern how.

edclowneyEd Clowney taught Biblical Theology for years at WTS, and wrote some great books on the subject. He had a very helpful way of illustrating just how we should track from initial instances in the Old Testament to their fulfillment in the New Testament.

Clowney’s Triangle takes into account the initial reference in the Old Testament (S), the initial truth to which the original audience understood that reference to point (T1), and the ultimate reality to which the reference pointed (Tn).

Clowney's TriangleConnecting S and T1 is the symbolic reference. For example, when God required a goat to be slaughtered on the Day of Atonement in Leviticus 16, the sacrifice of the goat (S) symbolized God’s provision for forgiving the sins of his people through blood sacrifice (T1). There’s a close connection here between the symbol and what the symbol represents. As we read through the Scripture, not just Leviticus but the entirety of the Old and New Testaments, we see that the fulfillment of this truth to the nth degree is Jesus’ sacrificial death for sins which purchases our forgiveness. The typological reference isn’t made until we’ve understood the symbolic reference through redemptive history, the history or revelation.

Poythress, in his book Reading the Word of God in the Presence of God, points out why the practice of typological interpretation can be dangerous and misleading if we don’t respect the flow of redemptive history. He says that if we discount T1, we leap directly from a specific text (S) to the truth in Christ (Tn). “Its endpoint is still in a good place, in the truth in Christ. But the claim about a typological reference misses genuine connections by replacing them with an artificial one.”

If God is the Lord of his Word, then we must learn to read in the way in which he has disclosed himself. Anything other than that is dangerous arrogance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s